By: Michael Szudarek

In modern media landscape, the term “pink slime journalism” has emerged as a troubling descriptor for a trend that undermines the very essence of journalistic integrity. Coined in reference to the processed meat filler known as “pink slime,” this term aptly captures the essence of sensationalized, low-quality journalism that prioritizes clickbait over truth, often at the expense of public trust.

Pink slime journalism manifests in various forms, from tabloid gossip to politically motivated propaganda, and its defining characteristics include sensationalism, lack of fact-checking, and a disregard for ethical standards. In an era where information spreads rapidly through digital channels, the proliferation of pink slime journalism poses a significant threat to informed public discourse.

One of the most alarming aspects of pink slime journalism is its role in shaping public opinion and influencing political outcomes. And it can often show up on your doorstep disguised as legitimate local news. In Michigan, for example, MLive just reported that a 9-page broadsheet called The Michigan Independent (with no contact information or identifying details) was delivered to nearly a million people which makes it the state’s most widely circulated newspaper. The MLive story notes that it is difficult to identify who owns the news network, “even though a trail of breadcrumbs points back to Democratic operatives, a super PAC and political motives.” The article continued: “These kinds of shadowy networks of political action committees, donors that are not transparent, political operatives that are behind these sites are trying to shape public opinion in an election year, where the stakes are already very high,” said Hannah Covington, senior director of education content at The News Literacy Project.

Other examples of this deceptive practice include:

  • Acquiring the assets and online domain of a defunct news outlet (e.g., and filling it with AI-generated content sourced from hyper-partisan websites and content from special interest groups. This content often lacks depth and original reporting, with instances of overtly deceptive framing of stories.
  • Establishing a new website with a name resembling that of a credible news source (e.g.,, solely to disseminate politically motivated attacks and partisan propaganda funded by political interests.

These tactics deceive audiences by presenting misinformation or biased perspectives under the guise of legitimate journalism, eroding trust in reliable sources of news and distorting public discourse. Identifying and scrutinizing such instances of “pink slime” journalism is crucial in promoting informed civic engagement.

Local journalism and pink slime

Local newspapers have long served as the backbone of journalism, providing essential coverage of community events, local government proceedings, and issues directly impacting residents’ lives. However, as advertising revenue dwindles and readership declines, many local newspapers have been forced to shutter their doors or significantly reduce their staff and coverage areas.

The collapse of local journalism has created fertile ground for pink slime journalism to flourish. With fewer reporters on the ground to investigate stories and hold public officials accountable, communities become more vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation. In the absence of reliable local news sources, residents may turn to alternative sources of information, including partisan blogs, social media echo chambers, and sensationalized tabloids.

Furthermore, the decline of local newspapers means there are fewer gatekeepers to filter out unreliable or misleading content. Pink slime journalism thrives in environments where editorial standards are lax, and sensationalism is prioritized over accuracy. Without robust local newsrooms to serve as watchdogs, misinformation can spread unchecked, poisoning public discourse and eroding trust in the media. The impact of the collapse of local journalism is felt most acutely in underserved communities, where access to reliable information is already limited. Without local newspapers to amplify their voices and shine a spotlight on important issues, marginalized communities risk being overlooked and underserved by the media.

Ultimately, the collapse of local journalism has created a dangerous vacuum that pink slime journalism is all too eager to fill. Reversing this trend requires collective action from journalists, policymakers, and citizens alike to ensure that communities have access to reliable, trustworthy news sources that uphold the principles of ethical journalism and serve the public interest.